Oscar’s Grind Blackjack
2021年3月15日Register here: http://gg.gg/oo154
Am trying to establish how Oscar’s G wld function if played within limits as suggested, being one of the best systems around.For eg. if stop loss was 100 units and one were to stop after winning 20 units each time, how many times would one win 20 units before one loss of a 100 units?Could anyone fill me in on this?
Any thoughts on whether or not one should use Oscar’s Grind while playing Blackjack? Is a good way of making extra money in the short run. However, in the long run, it seems as though it could possibly lead you to financial disaster if you end up betting, say $1,000 per hand. With the Oscar’s Grind betting system the player begins with a single unit-if that hand is won, the player has turned a one-unit profit, and the series ends. If the player loses a hand, the wager remains the same until another hand is won, at which point it’s increased by one unit.By ’best’ I assume you mean one that loses the least when compared to other progression schemes?The basic idea is this. If you play a good 6d shoe game, with a house edge of about .26% (-.26% from the player’s viewpoint) then that is going to be what you are going to lose no matter how you modify your bets (unless you count cards of course).Oscar’s Grind Blackjack ExplainedThe question is, with Oscar’s Grind, (and this is not something I can answer myself since I do not play progressions of any type) is ’what will your average bet be over time?’ Because once you know that, you know that for each round you are going to lose .0026 times your average bet, when summed over the period of time you play. There’s not much other math that is important here. Your expected loss is a function of the house edge times your average bet. about once every 1000 losing sessions where you quit at -100, you are going to have an extra loser which is the -.26% house edge showing up.Oscar’s Grind Blackjack Betting SystemThere is probably some math somewhere that breaks this down into groups of ’hands’ and ’average bets’ but hardly anybody discussions progressions nowadays since they are all losing systems, and they make you lose faster than if you just flat-bet the table minimum and play as long as possible losing as little as possible. It would be far better to work on counting cards and actually play with an advantage over the house where you can really win more than you lose, although it is a wild ride.Oscar’s Grind Blackjack ForumOscar’s Grind Blackjack ExampleThe punch line is that you are going to have lots of 20 unit win streaks, about 1/5 the number of 100 unit losing streaks, but you are occasionally going to be hit by an extra 100 unit loss, to take you to that house advantage of -.26% overall. There’s no way to get away from that. Most progression players live on the fact that they have way more winning sessions than losing sessions, completely ignoring the important detail that they are losing way more in those infrequent losing sessions than they are winning in all those short winning sessions. Sessions mean nothing, the bottom line is total winnings or loss. Progressions are going to lose.
Register here: http://gg.gg/oo154
https://diarynote.indered.space
Am trying to establish how Oscar’s G wld function if played within limits as suggested, being one of the best systems around.For eg. if stop loss was 100 units and one were to stop after winning 20 units each time, how many times would one win 20 units before one loss of a 100 units?Could anyone fill me in on this?
Any thoughts on whether or not one should use Oscar’s Grind while playing Blackjack? Is a good way of making extra money in the short run. However, in the long run, it seems as though it could possibly lead you to financial disaster if you end up betting, say $1,000 per hand. With the Oscar’s Grind betting system the player begins with a single unit-if that hand is won, the player has turned a one-unit profit, and the series ends. If the player loses a hand, the wager remains the same until another hand is won, at which point it’s increased by one unit.By ’best’ I assume you mean one that loses the least when compared to other progression schemes?The basic idea is this. If you play a good 6d shoe game, with a house edge of about .26% (-.26% from the player’s viewpoint) then that is going to be what you are going to lose no matter how you modify your bets (unless you count cards of course).Oscar’s Grind Blackjack ExplainedThe question is, with Oscar’s Grind, (and this is not something I can answer myself since I do not play progressions of any type) is ’what will your average bet be over time?’ Because once you know that, you know that for each round you are going to lose .0026 times your average bet, when summed over the period of time you play. There’s not much other math that is important here. Your expected loss is a function of the house edge times your average bet. about once every 1000 losing sessions where you quit at -100, you are going to have an extra loser which is the -.26% house edge showing up.Oscar’s Grind Blackjack Betting SystemThere is probably some math somewhere that breaks this down into groups of ’hands’ and ’average bets’ but hardly anybody discussions progressions nowadays since they are all losing systems, and they make you lose faster than if you just flat-bet the table minimum and play as long as possible losing as little as possible. It would be far better to work on counting cards and actually play with an advantage over the house where you can really win more than you lose, although it is a wild ride.Oscar’s Grind Blackjack ForumOscar’s Grind Blackjack ExampleThe punch line is that you are going to have lots of 20 unit win streaks, about 1/5 the number of 100 unit losing streaks, but you are occasionally going to be hit by an extra 100 unit loss, to take you to that house advantage of -.26% overall. There’s no way to get away from that. Most progression players live on the fact that they have way more winning sessions than losing sessions, completely ignoring the important detail that they are losing way more in those infrequent losing sessions than they are winning in all those short winning sessions. Sessions mean nothing, the bottom line is total winnings or loss. Progressions are going to lose.
Register here: http://gg.gg/oo154
https://diarynote.indered.space
コメント